Components of Rating Sukuk in Iran's Capital Market

Babajani, Jafar; Sahebgharani, Amir Abbas

doi:10.30497/ifr.2018.2241

Components of Rating Sukuk in Iran's Capital Market

Document Type : Paper

Authors

¹ Accountant Professor, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran,

² PH. D student in accountancy of Allame Tabataba'i University

10.30497/ifr.2018.2241

Abstract

The establishment of rating agencies as important financial institutions in the capital market has been emphasized by SEO in recent years and its related instructions were officially published in 2016. Meanwhile, with the growth of financing instruments in the capital market and the priority given to sukuk, the need for the former's rating is necessary for determining its value and accelerating the financing process of economic organizations by using it. Presently, the lack of this rating has been compensated by including a guarantor in the structure, but this has for some reasons created obstacles in the way of issuing it and challenged the financing process with this kind of instrument. On the other hand, the capital market supervising agent's requirements for rating sukuk have been set out before its being issued and the sukuk rating has replaced guaranty in sukuk structure.
This article demonstrates how the dimensions and components of sukuk rating in Iran capital market were assessed by experts using Delphi technique with the aim of achieving consensus on it. The theoretical foundations of the presented model were derived from three sources, namely sukuk issue instructions, rating institutes' methods at both national and international levels, and Islamic financial institutes' instructions in regard to rating sukuk. These factors altogether, which have been approved by experts, can illustrate the general framework of rating sukuk in the country's capital market.

Keywords

20.1001.1.22518290.1397.7.2.7.3

References

سازمان بورس و اوراق بهادار (1389). دستورالعمل انتشار اوراق اجاره، تهران: مرکز پژوهش، توسعه سازمان بورس. اصلاحیه 1394.

سازمان بورس و اوراق بهادار (1389). دستورالعمل انتشار اوراق سفارش ساخت، تهران: مرکز پژوهش، توسعه سازمان بورس. اصلاحیه 1394.

سازمان بورس و اوراق بهادار (1392). رویه عملیاتی انتشار اوراق اجاره، تهران: مرکز پژوهش، توسعه سازمان بورس.

سازمان بورس و اوراق بهادار (1394). آیین‌نامه نظام راهبری شرکتی، تهران: مرکز پژوهش، توسعه سازمان بورس.

سازمان بورس و اوراق بهادار (1395). دستورالعمل تأسیس و فعالیت مؤسسات رتبه‌بندی، تهران: مرکز پژوهش، توسعه سازمان بورس. اصلاحیه 1394.

دموداران، اسوات (1975). مالی شرکتی پیشرفته با رویکرد کاربردی، مترجمان: احمد بدری، روح‌اله فرهادی و سارا شهریاری، تهران: نص.

مجلس شورای اسلامی (1388). قانون توسعه ابزارها و نهادهای مالی جدید در راستای تسهیل اجرای سیاست‌های کلی اصل چهل و چهارم قانون اساسی.

مجلس شورای اسلامی (1394). قانون رفع موانع تولید رقابتپذیر و ارتقای نظام مالی کشور.

موسویان، سیدعباس (1392). ابزارهای مالی اسلامی (صکوک)، تهران: سازمان انتشارات پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و اندیشه اسلامی.

موسویان، سیدعباس، بلال وثوق و علی فرهادیان‌آرانی (1392). شناخت و رتبه‌بندی ریسک‌های ابزارهای مالی اسلامی (صکوک). اندیشه مدیریت راهبردی، شماره 13،
187-212.

Altman, E. I., & Hotchkiss, E. (2010). Corporate Financial Distress and Bankruptcy: Predict and Avoid Bankruptcy, Analyze and Invest in Distressed Debt (Vol. 289). John Wiley & Sons.

Ahmed, E. R., Islam, M. A., & Alabdullah, T. T. Y. (2014). Islamic Sukuk: Pricing Mechanism and Rating. Journal of Asian Scientific Research, 4(11), 640.

Arundina, T., Omar, M. A., & Kartiwi, M. (2015). The Predictive Accuracy of Sukuk Ratings; Multinomial Logistic and Neural Network Inferences. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 34, 273-292.

Fabozzi, F. J., & Drake, P. P. (2009). Finance: Capital Markets, Financial Management, and Investment Management (Vol. 178). John Wiley & Sons.

Hassoune, A. (2007). Standard & Poor's Approach to Rating sukuk. S&P Ratings Direct. September.

Kothari, V. (2006). Securitization: The Financial Instrument of the Future (Vol. 385). John Wiley & Sons.

Murciai, F. C. D. S., Dal-Ri Murcia, F., Rover, S., & Borba, J. A. (2014). The Determinants of Credit Rating: Brazilian Evidence. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 11(2), 188-209.

Mseddi, S., & Naifar, N. (2013). Rating Methodology and Evaluating the Issuer of Sukuk. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 8(4), 262-275.

McMillen, M. J. (2007). Asset Securitization Sukuk and Islamic Capital Markets: Structural Issues in These Formative Years. Wis. Int'l LJ, 25, 703.

Poon, W. P., & Chan, K. C. (2008). An Empirical Examination of the Informational Content of Credit Ratings in China. Journal of Business Research, 61(7), 790-797.

RCP, M., & Partners, A. (2003). Risk Rating of Asset Managers: The Investor’s Measure of Trust. Report.

Tichy, G. (2011). Credit Rating Agencies: Part of the Solution or Part of the Problem?. Intereconomics, 46(5), 232-262.

Usmani, M. T. (2007). Sukuk and Their Contemporary Applications. In Translated From the Original Arabic by Sheikh Yusuf Talal DeLorenzo, AAOIFI Shari’a Council Meeting, Saudi Arabia.

http://www.aaoifi.com

http://www.iifm.net

http://www.marc.com

http://www.anpad.org

http://is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook

http://www.iirating.com.

http:// www.iefpedia.com